Site search



Natural Health On The Web Blog

Join Frank's Fanpage Follow Frank on Twitter
Add Frank on Myspace

Pages

June 2024
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930






Categories

Tags

Blogroll

Meta

Share

Lyin’ Headline

Untangling Misleading Headline that Says Exercise Doesn’t Rev Metabolism

Despite misleading headline, research has clearly shown that exercise <i>does</i>, in fact, increase metabolism.

Despite misleading headline, research has clearly shown that exercise does, in fact, increase metabolism.

If a Web site headline could be given a fine by the Newspaper Police for misleading the public, the amount collected on this one would be enough to save the dying newspaper business:   “Exercise not likely to rev up your metabolism.”

In January, I wrote an article about why it was important to avoid “all-or-nothing ” thinking; how the notion of not going “all out” or “full throttle” in an exercise session often leads people to pack it in and not do it at all.

Four months later, I’m worried that kind of flawed thinking will resurface, as a recent report finds that exercise does not ignite the body’s metabolic rate – a study that flies in the face of years of research that says just the opposite.

The study comes out of the University of Colorado in Denver and it looked at approximately 65 men who engaged in low-intensity and high-intensity bicycling.  The men varied in their fitness levels (from the moderately active, to the triathlete, to the sedentary; those who were thin as a rail, to those who were as big as a house), which gave the researchers comparisons as to how efficient their bodies were in burning fat, depending on whether or not they exercised on a given day and their physical makeup.

What they found was that whether the fellow was Phil the Fitness Freak, or Sid the Sedentary Sloth, there were no “significant” differences in the men’s ability to burn fat in the 24-hour period after they exercised.  What’s more, there wasn’t much of a difference in fat-burning on the days that the men didn’t exercise, either.

Now, for many people who just read the headlines of stories, this report – “Exercise not likely to rev up your metabolism” – would be all they needed to get out of the exercise excursion business altogether.

But that’s why it’s so important to always look beyond the headlines, because the researchers themselves do some significant hedging of their bets with respect to their findings.

For instance, they say that people’s metabolic rate doesn’t stay revved 24 hours after an exercise session.  Yet they also point out that their participants engaged in moderate activity, cycling, and expending about 400 calories per session.

Go to any health club that has pre-programmed exercise sessions on their treadmill, stair climber or elliptical.  Hit the “Fat Burning” button.  You’ll notice that the fat burning exercise sessions are the ones that combine high intensity and low intensity in one exercise session – not low intensity for the entire session, or high intensity for the entire session, like these researchers had the participants perform.

So, in other words, fat burning was not high for their study, but that can’t be universally applied to all exercise.

Secondly, the researchers try and dispel the notion that weight training revs up the metabolism with a rather flimsy argument.  They say that while muscle burns more calories than fat – by a 10:2 ratio, in fact – few people put on enough muscle to burn a high number of calories.

Huh?  So, whatever the researchers’ define as “few,” that’s enough for them to say conclusively that putting on muscle doesn’t ignite someone’s metabolism?

The fact is, people truly committed to their exercise regimens and who are able to put on pounds of muscle do kickstart their metabolism.  Otherwise, how would they have been able to put on pounds of muscle in the first place?

Finally, the researchers say that while exercise does help with weight loss, one also has to consider diet; in other words, that it’s all about “calories in vs. calories out.”

Who in the health world doesn’t know that?  Obviously, the more you take in, the greater need there is to work off those calories by exercising.  But by exercising, you’re burning off the calories, and you’re also breaking down your body’s muscles so they can become stronger and more efficient in turning those calories into fuel for muscle tissue.

Trust me, I could go on, but I’ll keep my criticisms to three.

For all those who read this deceiving headline with some despair, I hope this breakdown has helped to clarify the issue.  The benefits of exercise are manifold and even a little bit of it pays dividends.

Don’t let a misleading headline bilk you into an all-or-nothing mentality.

Source:

msnbc.msn.com

Related Posts

No related posts.

  


Enjoy this article?
Receive your FREE subscription
to Frank Mangano's natural health newsletter.
Simply enter your primary e-mail address.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will NEVER be rented, traded or sold.


Visit my new site: Self Help On The Web

Join Frank's Fanpage Follow Frank on Twitter

Write a comment

You need to login to post comments!

Books Authored by Frank Mangano


The Blood Pressure Miracle The 60 Day Prescription Free Cholesterol Cure Alzheimer's Defense You Can Attract It Power Of Thin Power Of Thin
Discovering The Truth About
High Blood Pressure May Save
A Life...It Could Be YOURS
Win The War Naturally
Against High Cholesterol
Learn How You Can Prevent,
Slow And Even Halt
Alzheimer's Disease
You Can Attract It ...
Using The Law of Attraction
to Get What You Want
Power Of Thin
Change Your Thinking
Change Your Weight
The Mangano Method:
An All-Natural Approach
To Fight Gout