<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Health News Blog &#187; Mammograms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?cat=29&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs</link>
	<description>Health News and Commentary from Frank Mangano</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:00:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mammograms Offer No Protection Against Breast Cancer, Study Finds</title>
		<link>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?p=42</link>
		<comments>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?p=42#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mammograms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Claims that annual mammograms decrease women&#8217;s risk of dying from breast cancer are being contested by an increasing number of doctors. After re-analyzing studies originally performed on the benefits of mammograms and finding them unconvincing, Danish researcher Dr. Peter Gotzsche made a claim about the ineffectiveness of mammograms in a study published in &#8220;The Lancet&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Claims that annual mammograms decrease women&#8217;s risk of dying from breast cancer are being contested by an increasing number of doctors.</p>
<p>After re-analyzing studies originally performed on the benefits of mammograms and finding them unconvincing, Danish researcher Dr. Peter Gotzsche made a claim about the ineffectiveness of mammograms in a study published in &#8220;The Lancet&#8221; in October 2006.</p>
<p>Since that publication, other doctors have joined in saying not only do mammograms offer no protection, they may actually increase women&#8217;s risk of cancer because the process by which they are performed exposes patients to radiation.</p>
<p>&#8220;The latest evidence shifts the balance towards harm and away from benefits,&#8221; said Dr. Michael Baum of University College in London.</p>
<p>Here’s something you may find to be a bit concerning. Canadian columnist Dr. W. Gifford-Jones says women between the ages of 40 and 49 who have mammograms on a regular basis are twice as likely to lose their lives from breast cancer as women who are not screened.</p>
<p>Gifford-Jones outlined other risks as well. Some authorities say the squeezing of women&#8217;s breasts during mammograms may actually result in ruptured blood vessels, causing cancer to spread to other parts of the body, making a patient&#8217;s risk of death higher.</p>
<p>Studies show that 30 percent of time, mammograms fail to detect cancer in women aged 40 to 49. Aside from that it can take up to eight years before a breast tumor is large enough to be detected. Eight years is certainly enough time for the cancer to spread to other parts of the body.</p>
<p>Aside from being a waste of time, mammograms are out right dangerous and can even have deadly repercussions.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?feed=rss2&#038;p=42</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
