<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Health News Blog &#187; Artificial Sweeteners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?cat=116&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs</link>
	<description>Health News and Commentary from Frank Mangano</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:00:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>An Artificial “Win” for Artificial Sweeteners</title>
		<link>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?p=686</link>
		<comments>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?p=686#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Sweeteners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aspartame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saccharin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest “Pro Artificial” Study Naturally Misses the Mark A new study says that artificial sweeteners like Splenda and Sweet &#38; Low don’t pose the health risks that people like me and others suggest. Could natural health advocates like me have been wrong all along?  Let’s investigate, shall we? An Italian study recently published in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Latest “Pro Artificial” Study Naturally Misses the Mark</strong></em></p>
<div id="attachment_687" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 324px"><a href="http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/sweetener_packets.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-687" title="Artificial Sweeteners" src="http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/sweetener_packets.jpg" alt="Are artificial sweeteners like Splenda and Sweet &amp; Low safe to consume? Study says yes. I say no!" width="314" height="208" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Are artificial sweeteners like Splenda and Sweet &amp; Low safe to consume? Study says yes. I say no!</p></div>
<p>A new study says that artificial sweeteners like Splenda and Sweet &amp; Low don’t pose the health risks that people like me and others suggest.</p>
<p>Could natural health advocates like me have been wrong all along?  Let’s investigate, shall we?</p>
<p>An Italian study recently published in the journal <em>Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers &amp; Prevention</em> concludes that saccharin and aspartame – the two most widely used artificial sweeteners in the world today – pose no cancer risk to the people that consume them.</p>
<p>They discovered this after analyzing previous studies done on the issue (data collected was between 1991 and 2004) and comparing and contrasting control subjects’ diets with those who were diagnosed with stomach cancer, pancreatic cancer, and endometrial cancer.  Ultimately, they found saccharin and aspartame use to have no statistically significant impact on the subjects’ cancer diagnoses.</p>
<p>On its face, this looks like a win for the artificial sweetener industry.  It certainly flies in the face of a 2007 study done on artificial sweeteners and cancer, where European researchers found that rats consuming the sweet stuff were stricken by cancer after prolonged consumption.</p>
<p>Or does it?</p>
<p>In fact, it doesn’t, because the Italian researchers found that it didn’t contribute to only three kinds of cancer:  stomach, pancreatic, and endometrial.  Meanwhile, the 2007 European study found that it contributed to leukemia, lymphoma and breast cancer!</p>
<p>In other words, the Italian study’s only meaningful conclusion is that artificial sweeteners don’t contribute to <em>specific</em> cancers, not cancer in general.</p>
<p>But let’s pretend that artificial sweeteners in no way contributed to cancer.  That still doesn’t negate why you shouldn’t consume them, because health advocates like me and others don’t decry their usage for being cancer-causing.  We decry them for their contribution to a multitude of health risks, like weight gain, obesity and disrupting the body’s digestive function.</p>
<p>In fact, weight gain is the chief reason why health advocates like me oppose their use, as sugar-free varieties of sweets and other desserts trick the brain into thinking the body isn’t full, when in fact it is.  You can read more about this phenomenon <a href="http://www.naturalhealthontheweb.com/artificial-sweeteners/" target="_blank">here</a>, as I’ve talked about this in the past and, as always, back up my assertions with studies.</p>
<p>So, is this study a win for the artificial sweetener industry?  No, indeed.  People like me have never targeted artificial sweeteners for being cancer-causing.  They may indirectly cause cancer – obesity is <em>the</em> contributing factor in 90,000 cancer deaths every year, according to the American Cancer Society (in the U.S. alone) – but the main bone of contention with artificial sweeteners is how they contribute to weight gain.</p>
<p><strong>Sources:</strong><br />
<a title="foodnavigator.com" href="http://www.foodnavigator.com/Science-Nutrition/Artificial-sweeteners-not-linked-to-cancer-Study" target="_blank">foodnavigator.com</a><br />
<a title="cancer.org" href="http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS_1_1x_Excess_Weight_Linked_to_90000_US_Cancer_Deaths_Annually.asp" target="_blank">cancer.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?feed=rss2&#038;p=686</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Researchers Say Artificial Sweetener Saccharin Contributes to Weight Gain</title>
		<link>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?p=144</link>
		<comments>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?p=144#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Sweeteners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saccharin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weight Gain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sweet’N ‘Gro’? You know that saying, “If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is”?  It’s a saying that winds up being true more often than not.  Here’s the latest evidence of its truthfulness… Research conducted by scientists from Purdue University has found that those artificial sweeteners found in diet sodas, desserts, bottled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%" border="0">
<tr>
<td><img height="107" alt="Artificial Sweeteners" src="http://www.naturalhealthontheweb.com/images/artificial_sweeteners.jpg" width="160" border="0" /></td>
<td><strong>Sweet’N ‘Gro’?</strong></p>
<p>You know that saying, “If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is”?  It’s a saying that winds up being true more often than not.  Here’s the latest evidence of its truthfulness…</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Research conducted by scientists from Purdue University has found that those artificial sweeteners found in diet sodas, desserts, bottled waters and cereals does not help in the battle of the bulge.  In fact, artificial sweeteners may even contribute to weight gain and obesity!</p>
<p>Published in the February issue of the journal Behavioral Neuroscience, the Boilermaker (Purdue’s mascot) researchers fed lab rats two different kinds of yogurts:  one group with regularly sweetened yogurt, the other sweetened with the zero-calorie sweetener saccharin.  Across the board, the rats that ate the yogurt flavored with saccharin put on more weight, more fat, and ate more food later on than the rats that ate the regular yogurt.</p>
<p>What explains such a finding?  Well, the researchers don’t know for sure, but they believe it has something to do with the fact that zero-calorie sweeteners are digested in a fashion that the body doesn’t recognize.  When we consume food, our bodies respond through the feeling of satiety, or fullness.  This is the body’s own way of saying, “Ok, I’m full, enough is enough.”  With zero-calorie sweeteners, however, that satiety factor is taken away, often leading one to eat more than they would were they to eat a food sweetened with regular sugar. </p>
<p>As with nearly all of these studies, more research needs to be done before making any broad based conclusions, but their theory makes a lot of sense, especially considering the fact that one in three Americans are considered obese, despite the widespread consumption of these so called “guilt-free” foods.</p>
<p>Another interesting finding by the researchers was the fact that the group of rats that ate the saccharin-sweetened yogurt did not show an increased core body temperature.  Of course, the body’s temperature and metabolic rate increase when we consume calories as calories are a unit of heat.  How fast the body’s metabolic rate is often determines one’s propensity to gain weight (an increased metabolic rate is one of the many reasons why exercising regularly is so beneficial).  The fact that the rats’ metabolic rate did not increase in the saccharin group may help explain the observed weight gain.</p>
<p>If this sounds counterintuitive to you—eating fewer calories yet putting on more weight—fear not:  It sounds counterintuitive to the scientists as well, especially considering the fact that millions of people can eat diet foods and no-calorie sweeteners without putting on a pound.  But for millions of other people—people who are eating these no-calorie sweeteners, exercising regularly, and not losing weight—this finding helps explain the lack of results  (it also corroborates a finding on diet soda’s link to obesity I wrote about last year).</p>
<p>So, does this finding mean you should start drinking regular soda and foods saturated with sugar rather than no-calorie sweeteners?  Certainly not.  What it means is that just because a food or drink without added calories may seem like you can eat more of it, you can’t.  After all, as the saying goes, if it sounds too good to be true…well, you know the rest. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://naturalhealthontheweb.com/mangano-minute/blogs/?feed=rss2&#038;p=144</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
